Joe Patrice is an Editor at Above the Law. For over a decade, he practiced as a litigator at...
Kathryn Rubino is a member of the editorial staff at Above the Law. She has a degree in journalism...
Joe and Kathryn have a lot to break down this week. Amy Coney Barrett’s supporters tried to give her a nickname and managed to make an even bigger mess of it. As she begins her hearings, you’ll not be able to get her new nickname out of your head. Meanwhile, Biglaw firms are split on whether or not to give bonuses to associates right now, but Kathryn explains that it looks better to pay now than to wait. And the online bar exams held last week were riddled with glitches, but examiners are committed to pretending it went off without a hitch.
Special thanks to our sponsors, Paper Software and LexisNexis® InterAction®.
Notify me when there’s a new episode!
Published: | October 13, 2020 |
Podcast: | Thinking Like a Lawyer - Above the Law |
Category: | Legal News |
![]() |
Thinking Like a Lawyer - Above the Law |
Above the Law's Joe Patrice and Kathryn Rubino examine everyday topics through the prism of a legal framework.
The second impeachment of Trump's tenure raises easily answered questions.
Too bad it was such a slow news week...
The firm says Cleta Mitchell went rogue, but that's only the start of their issues.
Things have to get better from here, right?
You can have a second act, but you don't get a consequence-free mulligan.
It's made-for-cable holiday movie season, so we tackle the burning question.