Expert Service Provider discuss strategies and preparation for implementing effective ERM programs.
Best’s Insurance Law Podcast
Sean Murphy is a strategic communications counselor with extensive corporate reputation and litigation crisis communications experience. Sean...
LoriAnn Lowery-Biggers has over 25 years of experience in the global finance and insurance industry, notable as...
John Czuba has 28 years experience in the publishing industry. Since 1994 he has worked for the...
Expert Service Providers Sean Murphy and LoriAnn Lowery-Biggers from Courtroom Sciences, Inc. discuss Enterprise Risk Management and challenges facing insurance carriers and other corporations.
Special thanks to our sponsor, AM Best Company, Best’s Insurance Professional Resources, including Qualified Member attorneys, adjusters and expert service providers.
The Insurance Law Podcast
Enterprise Risk Management Strategies
Intro: This is the Insurance Law Podcast, brought to you by Best’s Recommended Insurance Attorneys.
John Czuba: Welcome to The Insurance Law Podcast, the broadcast about timely and important legal issues affecting the insurance industry. I’m John Czuba, Managing Editor of Best’s Recommended Insurance Attorneys, including expert service providers.
We’re pleased to have with us today two representatives from expert service provider Courtroom Sciences in Irving, Texas.
Courtroom Sciences partners with corporate legal departments and law firms throughout the entire litigation process from the moment a crisis occurs through discovery, trial preparation, jury selection, and the trial itself. Joining us for a discussion today are Sean Murphy and LoriAnn Lowery-Biggers.
Sean Murphy is a strategic communications counselor with extensive corporate reputation and litigation crisis communications experience. Sean has worked with a number of leading organizations across a wide range of industries on public communications challenges presented by high-stakes and high-profile crisis cases.
LoriAnn Lowery-Biggers has over 25 years of experience in the global finance and insurance industry, notable as President of Lloyd’s of London for North America, and President of Navigators Commercial Insurance Company.
She is a director on the corporate board and chairperson of the finance and investment committee of CopperPoint Mutual Insurance Holding Company, and a director on the boards of Brown & Riding Insurance, Inc., Protective Insurance, Inc., and Courtroom Sciences. LoriAnn also sits on the Council on Litigation Management, and is a member of Global YPO.
LoriAnn and Sean, thanks so much for joining us this morning.
LoriAnn Lowery-Biggers: Thank you for having us, John.
Sean Murphy: Thank you.
John Czuba: Today, they will be addressing enterprise risk management and challenges facing insurance carriers. And for our first question today, we’ll direct towards LoriAnn.
LoriAnn, enterprise risk management has increasingly become a top priority for boards of directors and C-suite executives. What trends are driving this increased focus?
LoriAnn Lowery-Biggers: So First of all, we have to really understand that we are in an unprecedented and evolving landscape unlike anything that we have ever seen historically.
So a few key trends that are driving this increased focus, particularly from the board and the C-suite levels are rapid speed of business model interruption and disruption, industry changes, corporate tax reforms, political uncertainty, increasing workplace violence, reputational and headline risks, cyber threats unlike we’ve ever seen, crisis management needs, new litigation, regulatory risks and scrutiny, innovation and technology disruptions.
Sustaining customer loyalty and retention, which we all know is ever-changing with the Amazon effect. Attracting and competing for talent and risks associated with culture, retention, and succession planning, economic conditions globally, risks with M&A.
Frankly on the flip side, risks with limited opportunities for organic growth, clashing and changing generational work structures and cultural resistance to change, and inability to migrate operational efficiencies. And quite frankly, the list could go on and on and on, however, I believe we only have a short window for the podcast, so I don’t want to depress everyone right from the start. But suffice it to say, we are in uncharted waters.
John Czuba: Okay so then what should companies prioritize as part of their ERM strategy? What are the biggest areas of vulnerability, and are there any areas being overlooked?
LoriAnn Lowery-Biggers: Yeah so it’s all about intentional implementation of risk oversight. And then I’m going to say that intentional implementation of risk oversight instead of that, so many companies, what they currently are doing, which is reactionary procurement of risk management.
What I mean by that is that companies need to focus on the quality of the enterprise risk management process and not just have a check-the-box exercise, for lack of a better term that there is a risk function and an associated list of risks that they’re literally going through with a check mark.
They also, number two, need to focus on behaviors, making ERM a corporate and a cultural asset as well as an oversight priority. So the tone comes from the top, but it’s cascaded throughout the entire organization.
But then they need to ensure management communicates and engage the entirety of that organization in terms of the importance of ERM, the accountability associated with that, and then the pride that comes with having an organization that has really thought through and implemented ERM changes.
And then last, but certainly not the least is that they need to establish and sustain board-level dialogue, oversights, protocols, and best practices, and emphasize the importance of the board working in conjunction with the management on the short and the long-term strategy and implementation of such enterprise’s management.
In other words, instill it in the corporate DNA.
John Czuba: So LoriAnn, how are major insurers evaluating their insureds in terms of ERM preparedness?
LoriAnn Lowery-Biggers: Well it’s very different than it used to be. They are looking at things through the lens of all four quadrants of risk. So number one, the operational risks, their processes, the operational oversight, the resistance to change operations, supply chain management, distribution exposures.
Number two, the financial risks, everything from the cost of capital, the market risk, their growth and capital adequacy, the financial and investment risk tolerance that that company might have.
Number three, the strategic risks, which really, they haven’t looked at in the past, which include everything from how their industry is evolving, the customer base and how that’s changing. What is the future of their specific business and the competitive landscape associated with it? What are the headline, branding, and imaging risks? The succession challenges and, of course, the historic.
Number four, the hazard risks. So what trends are occurring in third-party liability, the employee exposures, the property exposures, the product liability, all of those things. So it’s becoming very, very clear that insureds are no longer being evaluated myopically and through a single underwriting lens.
And much more is being underwritten, correlated, and contemplated than the traditional hazard risks.
John Czuba: So LoriAnn, to what extent should crisis preparation planning be a part of ERM?
LoriAnn Lowery-Biggers: So on three of the corporate boards on which I sit, in the last four years, we’ve gone through three separate CEO searches.
It is irrefutable that crisis is the new norm, and throughout the candidate interview process, we heavily weighed the candidate’s ability, preparedness response and experience in crisis situations, and their prior leadership and outcomes of those situations very, very stringently.
It is almost, in today’s environment, a foregone conclusion that senior leaders now need to be equipped, empowered, and prepared for when the crisis happens, not if. Consequently, crisis preparedness in ERM is essential.
Actually no John, it is critical for there to be clear rules, roles, and responsibilities in the event of a crisis, while simultaneously addressing potential vulnerabilities well in advance of a crisis hitting.
How can leadership preemptively agree on the response and remedies if there is no contemplation of crisis within the ERM? It will likely be the difference between the company thriving post-crisis versus surviving in the face of such crisis and adversity.
John Czuba: LoriAnn, thanks so much. We’re going to direct some questions now to Sean. Sean, what are some of the practical steps a company can do to plan for a crisis?
Sean Murphy: The most important thing for companies to do in planning for a crisis is to make sure that they are anticipating the types of scenarios that they may encounter, and then developing responses to those types of scenarios in advance.
The other thing they need to do is prepare for the kinds of people, the types of spokespersons, the experts within their organizations who should be available very quickly to address those situations should they occur.
John Czuba: Are companies willing to do this type of crisis planning, or do you see some resistance out there?
Sean Murphy: They ignore it at their own peril, because particularly in today’s social media environment, you get one shot at managing a crisis, and one shot at giving the kind of response that people will respond to more favorably than if you don’t. So if you know your company and your industry, the types of crises you may encounter are very predictable.
If you collect personal information on your customers, then you should be prepared for a data breach. If you’re in a business that could have an environmental impact, you have to plan for accidents. Unfortunately today, if you’re a business, a municipality, or a mall, you have to prepare for the potential for violence.
John Czuba: What are some of the more common mistakes you see companies make during a crisis?
Sean Murphy: There are two ends of the spectrum on this. On the one end, you see companies that when they begin to talk about the crisis, they are talking about it from their own perspective and their own self-interests, and not taking into account the perspectives or the needs of the people who have been impacted by the crisis.
And that’s a critical mistake, because your messaging and your narrative need to be shaped around what it is you’re doing to deal with the situation on behalf of those people.
On the other hand, you have companies that are so anxious about the situation that they will admit liability versus taking responsibility, and those are two very different things. In a situation, it’s very important to accept responsibility and take actions that will remedy the situation. Liability is an entirely different matter, so it’s important to distinguish that when you’re shaping your messaging and shaping the narrative, and before you communicate that publicly.
John Czuba: For companies caught in a crisis, what are some of the first things that they should do?
Sean Murphy: They need to pull together the team of decision makers and experts within the company who can really affect the right solution. So you need people who can make final decisions in the company, and you need people whose responsibilities reflect the area that the crisis is affecting. If it’s a customer service issue, then you need to have the customer service head in the room and making decisions with you, giving you input etcetera.
You need to determine as best you can what has occurred. All of that information isn’t always immediately available, so you need to gather as much information as you possibly can, because the first response is usually, this is how we intend to deal with this crisis. Having some information about it is a good guide for how to communicate that information and put that together, because your first actions are about mitigating the current situation, and then talking about your plans for addressing the crisis overall.
Those are the most important things — getting the decision makers, getting the right experts in the room, determining as best you can what’s happened, and then, how can you mitigate the immediate situation, and what plans do you have to resolve the crisis, to address the crisis and ensure that a similar thing won’t happen again.
John Czuba: So who in an organization do you typically work with before a crisis to build a preparation plan, and are they the same people you work with during the actual crisis?
Sean Murphy: Yes, they are the same people, because in a crisis situation, as LoriAnn said, you have to deal where the decisions are made. This is at the C-suite level, this is in the general counsel’s office. These are the senior corporate communications people. These are the people who have the most impact in any crisis situation, because they have the ability to make the decisions. They have the expert information at their hands. They have the organization to manage. These are the people that have to be involved in any crisis situation.
John Czuba: With so many crisis situations being social media-driven today, how difficult is it to prepare for that type of incident?
Sean Murphy: It’s the same as any other crisis, although I think that people don’t feel that way, because it seems to come out of nowhere. Companies need to be able to respond in the same way they would to a traditional crisis. The key here, really, is what kinds of public policies and procedures do you have that reflect our current social mores and that can really pass public scrutiny in terms of how you operate? In a social media crisis, that’s immediately what you go to. While these are our operating standards and principles, if there is an issue is social media, it’s generally because they’ve been somehow violated or not followed.
Your best defense in those situations is to say, here is how it’s supposed to go. If it hasn’t gone this way, we’re going to figure out why. We’re going to fix it, and we’re going to take steps to make sure it doesn’t happen again. Again, at the end of the day, on the social media side, it is this enterprise risk management mandate to ensure that you have in place the kinds of policies, procedures, standards, corporate values that are reflective of whomever it is you’re doing business with, whether that’s the general public, consumers, or business to business. You want to make sure that you’re in sync with them.
John Czuba: Sean and LoriAnn, thank you both so much for joining us today.
LoriAnn Lowery-Biggers: Thank you, John.
Sean Murphy: Thank you, John.
John Czuba: You’ve just listened to LoriAnn Lowery-Biggers and Sean Murphy from Courtroom Sciences in Irving, Texas, and special thanks to today’s producer, Frank Vowinkle.
And thank you all for joining us for The Insurance Law Podcast. To subscribe to this audio program, go to our webpage www.ambest.com/claimsresource. And if you have any suggestions for a future topic regarding an insurance law case or issue, please email us at [email protected].
I’m John Czuba, and now this message.
Outro: Best’s Insurance Professionals and Claims Resource is the top website for locating qualified professionals and need to know insurance information for the claims market, brought to you by A.M. Best, the world leader in insurance industry information. Visit ambest.com/claimsresource.
Notify me when there’s a new episode!
|Published:||October 21, 2019|
|Podcast:||Best’s Insurance Law Podcast|
|Category:||Best Legal Practices|
Best’s Insurance Law Podcast
Best's Insurance Law Podcast features discussions with leading insurance attorneys about timely industry issues.