The Honorable Jonathan Lippman, former Chief Judge of New York and Chief Judge of the New York Court of...
Experienced Executive Director with a demonstrated history of working in the legal services industry.Strong business development professional skilled in...
Access to justice is more than just a way to help the poor; it also serves the bottom line of society. In this On The Road Episode, host John Williams talks to Judge Jonathan Lippman, former Chief Judge of New York, about his work and views on equal access to justice. Judge Lippman explains the importance of making people understand that equal access to civil legal services not only changes lives, but also serves our society and economy. Meaningful legal help often drastically reduces social services costs and lowers incarceration rates. The best investment in our society is in civil legal services for those in need.
Judge Jonathan Lippman is Of Counsel at Latham & Watkins LLP, and is former chief judge of New York and chief judge of the New York Court of Appeals.
Notify me when there’s a new episode!
Published: | October 12, 2018 |
Podcast: | On the Road |
Category: | Access to Justice |
![]() |
On the Road |
Recorded on the conference floor, "On the Road" includes highlights and interviews from popular legal events.
Lawyer and speaker Mitch Jackson explains how building meaningful relationships builds trust and leads to referrals and increased business.
Tom West shares the importance of using online payment systems in law firms to keep pace with the increasing virtualization of the practice of...
Legal Innovators CEO Bryan Parker shares why it’s important to make diversity and inclusion a business imperative rather than a nice-to-have.
Paula Davis-Laack shares tips for helping law firm teams communicate well and to develop a culture of resilience.
Mike Whelan shares tips on how to think through problems in your law firm and create purpose-driven solutions.
Clio’s COO shares the three things law firms did to succeed during the pandemic, making 40% more revenue per lawyer than their competitors.