Attorney Grace Yang works out of Harris Bricken’s Seattle and Beijing offices. Grace is Harris Bricken’s lead attorney on...
J. Craig Williams is admitted to practice law in Iowa, California, Massachusetts, and Washington. Before attending law school, his...
First identified in early December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, informally named Wuhan Coronavirus (now formally named COVID-19 by World Health Organization) after the area it was first found, has attracted the attention of the world. As of February 10, 2020, more than one thousand people have died, and tens of thousands of others have been infected. As fears continue to mount, disruptions to trade and travel are being felt around the world, and a rising volume of misinformation about the outbreak has resulted in the World Health Organization declaring an “infodemic”.
On today’s Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by attorney Grace Yang who works out of Harris Bricken’s Seattle and Beijing offices, as they discuss this new coronavirus outbreak. Craig and Grace look at the real picture of what’s happening, the overall impact on travel and business, and China’s new rules for dealing with the coronavirus.
Special thanks to our sponsors, Blue J Legal.
Lawyer 2 Lawyer: Law News and Legal Topics
Inside the Coronavirus Outbreak
Grace Yang: It seems to me this is worse than the 2003 SARS outbreak. Back then, the outbreak lead to business and school closures for a very long time and so this right now, I mean like we talked about, there is just no end in sight.
Intro Welcome to the award-winning podcast Lawyer 2 Lawyer, with J. Craig Williams, bringing you the latest legal news and observations with the leading experts in the legal profession. You are listening to Legal Talk Network.
I write a legal blog named May It Please the Court. I have two books out titled ‘How to Get Sued’ and ‘The Sled’.
Well, before we introduce today’s topic, we would like to take this time to thank our sponsor Blue J Legal.
Blue J Legal’s AI-Powered Foresight programs accurately predict court outcomes and accelerate case research by using factors instead of keywords. You can learn more at bluejlegal.com. That’s bluejlegal.com.
Well, it was first identified in early of December 2019, a novel strain of Coronavirus now renamed by the World Health Organization as COVID-19 and it’s comes from Wuhan, where it was first found and it’s attracted the attention of the world. As of February 10, 2020, more than a thousand people have died, tens of thousands of others have been infected.
Fears continue to mount, disruptions to trade and travel are being felt around the world and there’s a rising volume of misinformation about the outbreak, that’s resulted in the World Health Organization also declaring an “infodemic”.
Well today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we are going to discuss this new Coronavirus COVID-19 Outbreak. We are going to take a look at the real picture of what’s happening, the overall impact on travel and business and China’s new rules for dealing with that virus.
To help us explore this topic we have Attorney Grace Yang, who works out of Harris Bricken’s Seattle and Beijing offices. Grace is Harris Bricken’s lead attorney on China Labor and Employment Law Matters and she is the author of a book, ‘The China Employment Law Guide’. Her international background gives her a deep understanding of both American and Chinese cultures as well as their legal systems. She also writes for the China Law Blog, which can be found at chinalawblog.com.
Welcome to the show, Grace.
Grace Yang: Thank you Craig and thank you for having me here.
Grace Yang: Yeah. So, I mean apparently the outbreak started from Wuhan. You may have seen the seafood and meat market that was closed down, where the first cases were discovered.
And since then, there has been well a lot of – and like you said, a lot of misinformation because the Chinese Government, well their sort of first initial action was to — the action was to well cover up the whole picture, and then the spread was really fast, and the Chinese Government has been doing its best to control and prevent the epidemic from getting even worse.
But it’s been really tough.
Grace Yang: Yes, it has. Well, you know China is like a — like to tell other people, I mean China is a complex country. It’s incredible that it can build a hospital in 10 days, but it’s also the control that Beijing is trying to strengthen, is trying to basically control how the information flows and controls what other people see is also incredible. I mean not probably — I mean not in a good way.
I personally think that it could put even more efforts into caring about its people rather than just focusing on enhancing its control.
Grace Yang: The — well people –
Grace Yang: I think it has less to do with culture differences but more to do with how the Chinese Government is, like I said, trying to control its people and control how the — how others view it. It is heartbreaking to see that basically Chinese people or ordinary people are not being treated as people.
So it’s shocking to — I am from China originally, but when I hear of stories like the one that you were just saying that, that pains me too to even — I can’t even imagine the pain and how scared and frustrated and angry the Chinese people have been, especially those who are forced to — especially those who are in Wuhan province, where they are hit the hardest.
Grace Yang: The lack of accurate information. They are not — well, like before there is no free press, there is no free flow of accurate information. They are getting the pictures that are basically painted by Beijing, the Central Government there and they know that because of well, today’s world is different than before. I mean there is more people have access to the Internet and then, and people with — especially people with VPNs, they can sort of see what’s out there, what’s beyond the Great Wall and that changes things.
Grace Yang: In a way yes, and that is why they had been focusing their efforts and resources into strengthening its control. So it’s not going to back down just because people can see what’s outside of China.
Grace Yang: I think we sort of know, there are still free — there is free press outside of China and granted, it’s hard to gain truthful and accurate information from China, but there are honest reporters that are writing stories about what’s going on in China and some of them are in China and they are telling the rest of the world exactly what is going on. That is really helpful.
Grace Yang: Yes. Unfortunately that has been the case and not just independent bloggers, I mean even lawyers who are fighting for human rights in China, they have gone missing or are they have been threatened, their family members are threatened so that’s been going on for –
Grace Yang: I get concerned sometimes. I have been spending, I mean fortunately for me, I mean thankfully I have been spending more time, the majority of my time in Seattle, so but I have got extended family in China. So I am scared for them and my family tells me to be careful about what I say on platform like this and on WeChat because we get monitored for everything on there.
Grace Yang: Yeah, thank you.
Grace Yang: It has had a huge impact on businesses and even I mean companies doing business in the world in or with China as well. The travel industry has also been hit very hard. I mean people – I mean given the travel restrictions, the travel that’s to and from mainland China and the restrictions on traveling within China and imagine there are so many migrant workers working in China there.
I mean there must be so many people that are not getting to where they should be working now assuming that it’s okay to be back to work in their locales in China.
This has affected every aspect of the travel industry, hasn’t it?
Grace Yang: Yes, I can imagine what the people on the ships are going through and their family members, yeah, it’s really rough.
Grace Yang: I would say yes, many companies have adopted policies that I mean not necessarily banning travel to China, but really clearing with the managers of the companies prior to any travel to China to really limit the amount of travel, unless it’s truly necessary do not go to China.
Grace Yang: Everything is delayed. If something is – if an order is placed even before the Chinese New Year, I don’t think the chances are the buyers, the form buyers are now getting them, even with the factories sort of starting to open after the government mandated time off period. I mean the workers, most of the workers are not at the factories and so I’d say the factories are not fulfilling their orders and the buyers are not getting their products, not anytime soon.
Bob Ambrogi: Predict legal outcomes with Blue J Legal’s Foresight platforms. Using AI to analyze thousands of cases at administrative rulings, Blue J Legal can predict with 90% accuracy on average how a judge would likely rule in your case. Plus, you can research by factors and outcomes to find the relevant cases in seconds. Stay ahead of the curve and learn more at bluejlegal.com. That’s bluejlegal.com.
Grace, before the break, you were talking about some severe impacts that the people aren’t working, the docks aren’t being utilized and the products aren’t being shipped, materials aren’t coming in and it sounds like this has been going on for a period of time.
What can we expect economically to be the effect of this as — has its ripple effect across the world?
Grace Yang: Well, it has a huge effect on the economic activities in connection, really related to China, even in the smallest way. The thing is it’s not going to change anytime soon.
Grace Yang: We just – we don’t know when this will end.
Grace Yang: As much as I would like to say it will end even in March or maybe April, we don’t know, now we just don’t know.
Grace Yang: I would not necessarily trust the information that we are getting from the Chinese Government.
Grace Yang: I think, well, some measure such as having the employees work from home and just trying to avoid human, any sort of close contact as much as possible that would help. I’m not aware of any estimates.
Grace Yang: It seems to me this is worse than the 2003 SARS outbreak. Back then, the outbreak led to business and school closures for very long time and so this right now, I mean like we talked about, there is just no end in sight.
Grace Yang: It was a long time ago, but I remember being well staying at home and doing nothing and not going to school for very long time back then.
Grace Yang: Yeah.
Grace Yang: It sort of depends on where the employees are and what the local employment law say. Generally speaking, they should be paid at least while even with the business closure within a wage payment cycle, the employee should be provided with whatever the standard that is provided in their standard rate, in their employment contract.
I have heard stories and cases about employers not providing any pay to the employee and that does not sound right to me.
Grace Yang: Well yes, the short answer is yes. They are basically doing their normal work, the only difference is that they are doing at home, then they should be provided with their normal pay.
And the reason why I was a little hesitant was because before the work resumption, for example in Shanghai before the work resumption while this past Monday, February 10, if the employee had worked back then, it would count as overtime so they would get not just their normal pay but overtime pay or comp time in the work overtime pay.
Grace Yang: I am afraid the Chinese manufacturers are – start, well they have already started arguing force majeure, so they — the kind of remedy that is available to the foreign buyers that rely on Chinese goods are kind of limited. I mean they could try to negotiate to amend the agreement with the Chinese supplier but the chances are the Chinese suppliers going to say, well they just don’t know, there is so much uncertainty, they don’t know when they will be back, when they will be up and running.
Grace Yang: Yeah, ever since the outbreak, China has been pretty much coming out with new employment rules every day and the locales, they are rushing out new rules to deal with the epidemic as well.
It’s kind of hard. I mean given the local differences and how many rules that have come out since then, it’s a little bit hard to even give a summary but the focus is on protection of the employees and reducing the burden on the employers to the extent possible and not putting the employees’ health and life in danger by having them resume work.
Grace Yang: Generally speaking, the employers are encouraged or expected to sort of negotiate with the employee to come to understanding about possibly reducing work hours for reduced pay were be put on standby for an amended salary to deal with this situation but it’s difficult for everyone. I mean the employees don’t want to be punished for the outbreak and neither do the employers and the government’s position on this is sort of try to — the parties should negotiate and come to a mutual understanding of these issues and to the extent possible.
Grace Yang: Right.
Grace Yang: They may be able to — if they are laid off where – I mean they may be able to collect unemployment benefits and some locales have announced that they will try and make this application process as easy as possible and the employee supposedly they can do everything online without having to go, actually go to the labor, local labor bureau to get this taken care of. How in reality that works we don’t know because we have seen firsthand how not user-friendly the Chinese government websites can be.
Grace Yang: It is occurring throughout the country, it’s not just Wuhan.
Grace Yang: This we will see and — I mean my guess is that they will try to finance it, and they — I mean I have heard that the prices for goods have now gone up significantly because of the outbreak. But the problem is that there are just not enough medical supplies, not enough medical personnel and facilities. I guess we will see how it all works out.
Well Grace, it looks like we’ve just about reached the end of our program, so I would like to take the opportunity to invite you to share your final thoughts and your contact information for our listeners to reach out to you.
Grace Yang: Sure. I would say if you are an employer in China just be super careful about any potentially adverse employer decision you might be making today and everything is — pretty much everything is tricky here given the current state.
So think twice before you act and if you have any questions, please feel free to — well, first checkout our blog, China Law Blog and then you can send me email at [email protected].
I am Craig Williams, thanks for listening. You can join us next time for another great legal topic. When you want legal, think Lawyer 2 Lawyer.
Outro: Thanks for listening to Lawyer 2 Lawyer, produced by the broadcast professionals at Legal Talk Network.
Subscribe to the RSS feed on legaltalknetwork.com or in iTunes.
The views expressed by the participants of this program are their own, and do not represent the views of nor are they endorsed by Legal Talk Network, its officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives, shareholders, and subsidiaries. None of the content should be considered legal advice. As always, consult a lawyer.
Lawyer 2 Lawyer is a legal affairs podcast covering contemporary and relevant issues in the news with a legal perspective.
Chris Bruce discusses the killing of Ahmaud Arbery, the laws of Georgia, the handling of this case by prosecutors, and where this matter stands...
Attorney Meg Kurlinski discusses states’ reopening of businesses and the potential legal issues employers could face as employees return to work.
Professors Ned Foley and Charles Stewart III discuss voting during a pandemic and the impact the pandemic may have on the upcoming election.
Professors Robert Tsai and Glenn Cohen discuss the concepts of federalism and states’ rights in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 crisis.
Professors Ilya Somin and Philip L. Torrey discuss President Trump's intent to withhold federal funding to sanctuary cities and the impact this could have...
Guest professor James Pfander explores the recent SCOTUS ruling in Hernandez v. Mesa.