Featured Guest
James Sandman

James Sandman is president of the Legal Services Corporation, the single largest U.S. funder of civil legal aid programs...

Your Host
Monica Bay

Monica Bay is a Fellow at CodeX: The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics. She also writes for Thomson Reuters, ALM (Legaltech News),...

Episode Notes

The effects of technology on the law can be seen throughout the profession as these innovations are slowly integrated into the legal marketplace. However, has the union of new tech and the practice of law been significantly transformative for lawyers and clients? What factors have hindered the adoption of new technology in the legal sector and what catalysts might be implemented to accelerate the pace of change?

In this episode of Law Technology Now, host Monica Bay speaks with Legal Services Corporation President and CodeX FutureLaw keynote speaker Jim J. Sandman about his 10 reasons the law has been slow to adopt technology and the “levers of power” that might be engaged to accelerate that rate. Jim opens the interview with a brief summary of his time as managing partner at Arnold & Porter LLP, the general counsel for the District of Columbia Public Schools, and his five years of tenure as the president of Legal Services Corporation. He reflects on his CodeX 2016 FutureLaw Conference keynote speech and expresses that his intention was to provide an overview of where the profession stands with technology in law today. Technology, Jim explains, has made a number of improvements in law but hasn’t transformed service delivery in the same way it has in other industries and professions. He shares that 80% of the civil legal needs of low income people go unmet and analyzes statistics from legal aid organization studies that show that between 50% to 67% of individuals who can’t afford a lawyer are denied legal services because of inadequate resources. Jim then presents his list of 10 impediments to the adoption of technology in the legal profession, such as a sluggish lawyer administered regulatory system, and discusses changes made in the UK and Australia to approve non-lawyer ownership of law firms. He closes the interview with his list of the 10 agents of change, such as the legal media and state legislatures, that can aid in increasing efficiency for attorneys through the adoption of new technologies.

James J. Sandman has been president of the Legal Services Corporation since 2011. He practiced law with Arnold & Porter LLP for 30 years and served as the firm’s managing partner for a decade. From 2007 to 2011, he was general counsel for the District of Columbia Public Schools.

Brought to You by
Newsletter

Notify me when there’s a new episode!

Episode Details
Published: June 7, 2016
Podcast: Law Technology Now
Category: Legal Technology
Podcast
Law Technology Now
Law Technology Now

Law Technology Now features key players, in the legal technology community, discussing the top trends and developments in the legal technology world.

Listen & Subscribe
Recent Episodes
05/10/19
Closing the Gap: Innovating in a Fast Paced World

Wendy Butler Curtis discusses the work she and her team are doing at Orrick and the role of data driven decision making in a...

04/29/19
How AI Streamlines Daily Operations for Lawyers

Ryan Steadman and Alex Babin of Zero talk about how lawyers can streamline daily operations with AI.

04/23/19
2019 Am Law 100: Trends and Insights

Gina Passarella and Nick Bruch talk about the American Lawyer 2019 Am Law 100 data.

02/28/19
Legalweek 2019: The Life Of The Director Of Legal Project Management

Casey Flaherty talks about what it means to be the director of legal project management and if the community has been successful.

02/13/19
Legalweek 2019: LegalMation’s AI for Litigation

James Lee and Thomas Suh, co-founders of LegalMation, talk about how artificial intelligence can transform the practice of law.

01/31/19
Legal Innovation: Imagining Creative Solutions for Clients

Katie DeBord talks about how her role as chief innovation officer at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner helps the firm stay aggressively relevant in solving...