394th Judicial District Judge Roy Ferguson discusses the unanticipated social changes that judges have to contend with after ascending to the bench.
|
|
Stacy Frazier, Saralisa Brau, and Andrew King give their thoughts on how antitrust lawyers can be more involved with in-house counsel and the steps they should take if they want to transition.
|
|
Stephen Dillard talks about how judges have mostly been inaccessible to the public and how quite a few judges are now going against the grain and taking residence on Twitter.
|
|
Judge Nannette Baker and Judge Tim Brooks talk about the national conference of federal trial judges, which judges attend, and what key issues they talk about during the meeting.
|
|
Jeffrey T. Frederick talks about how to master voir dire and jury selection.
|
|
Professor Shari Diamond talks about her research on jury process, including her finding that our trust in the jury system is not misplaced.
Judge Joseph J. Farah shares how attorneys can prepare a proper motion.
William Kruse and Shruti Krishnan talk about their experiences as in-house counsels.
|
|
Above the Law Research Director Brian Dalton talks about ATL's law firm brand rankings based on an extensive survey of in-house counsel and what clients are looking for in a law firm.
Uber General Counsel Salle Yoo joins host Randy Milch to discuss how lawyers sometimes must leave their comfort zones to seize new opportunities.
|
|
Kara Jermain, an associate counsel at Gallup, discusses the advantages of in-house lawyers who can multitask communicate effectively.
|
|
CVS General Counsel Thomas Moriarty talks about whether working for a law firm is important to be in-house counsel.
|
|
Google GC Kent Walker how the company approaches the legal balance between personal privacy and the government’s need for access to information.
|
|
In this episode of In-House Legal, Yahoo General Counsel Ron Bell joins host Randy Milch for a conversation about national security vs. online privacy. For companies that provide access to online content worldwide there can be a fine line between freedom of expression and unlawful content. Just because something is legal in the U.S. does...
|
|
