<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Talk Network &#187; patent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legaltalknetwork.com/tag/patent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com</link>
	<description>The Premiere Online Legal Media Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:54:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Bayh-Dole Act and Stanford v Roche</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2010/12/the-bayh-dole-act-and-stanford-v-roche/</link>
		<comments>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2010/12/the-bayh-dole-act-and-stanford-v-roche/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Suffolk Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samuel Petuchowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=7318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are pleased to welcome Samuel J. Petuchowski, Ph.D., from Sunstein Kann Murphy &#38; Timbers LLP to this week&#8217;s IP podcast. Dr. Petuchowski discusses university and inventor patent rights and Stanford v Roche in this podcast.<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2010/12/the-bayh-dole-act-and-stanford-v-roche/' addthis:title='The Bayh-Dole Act and Stanford v Roche ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are pleased to welcome <strong>Samuel J. Petuchowski, Ph.D.</strong>, from <strong>Sunstein Kann Murphy &amp; Timbers LLP</strong> to this week&#8217;s IP podcast. Dr. Petuchowski discusses university and inventor patent rights and Stanford v Roche in this podcast.</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2010/12/the-bayh-dole-act-and-stanford-v-roche/' addthis:title='The Bayh-Dole Act and Stanford v Roche ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&amp;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">|</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2010/12/the-bayh-dole-act-and-stanford-v-roche/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://legaltalkmedia.com/LTN/SUL/SUL_121310_Bayh-Dole.mp3" length="4582210" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the Myriad Genetics Case</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ip-counsel/2010/11/inside-the-myriad-genetics-case/</link>
		<comments>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ip-counsel/2010/11/inside-the-myriad-genetics-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastman Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene sequence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Hawley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lando & Anastasi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myriad Genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Lando]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of New Hampshire School of Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=7159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On this edition of IP Counsel, host Attorney Peter Lando, partner at the firm of Lando &#38; Anastasi , LLP, welcomes Jeff Hawley, Professor of Intellectual Property Law at University of New Hampshire School of Law and former Chief Patent Counsel at Eastman Kodak, to discuss the highly-publicized Myriad Genetics case that is on appeal [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ip-counsel/2010/11/inside-the-myriad-genetics-case/' addthis:title='Inside the Myriad Genetics Case ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this edition of <strong><em>IP Counsel</em></strong>, host <a title="Attorney Peter Lando" href="http://www.lalaw.com/people/people.cfm?customel_datapageid_1631=1799" target="_blank"><strong>Attorney Peter Lando</strong></a>, partner at the firm of <a title="Lando &amp; Anastasi, LLP" href="http://www.lalaw.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Lando &amp; Anastasi , LLP</strong></a>, welcomes <a title="Jeff Hawley" href="http://law.unh.edu/jhawley/" target="_blank"><strong>Jeff Hawley, </strong></a>Professor of Intellectual Property Law at <a title="University of New Hampshire School of Law" href="http://law.unh.edu/" target="_blank"><strong>University of New Hampshire School of Law</strong></a> and former Chief Patent Counsel at <strong>Eastman Kodak</strong>, to discuss the highly-publicized <strong><em>Myriad Genetics</em></strong> case that is on appeal to the Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.  Peter and Jeff discuss whether isolated human DNA is patent-eligible and what other technologies would be impacted with this decision.</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ip-counsel/2010/11/inside-the-myriad-genetics-case/' addthis:title='Inside the Myriad Genetics Case ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&amp;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">|</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ip-counsel/2010/11/inside-the-myriad-genetics-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://legaltalkmedia.com/LTN/IPC/IPC_111210_MyriadGenetics.mp3" length="27626479" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is patentable subject matter? Can a business method be patented?</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ip-counsel/2010/09/what-is-patentable-subject-matter-can-a-business-method-be-patented/</link>
		<comments>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ip-counsel/2010/09/what-is-patentable-subject-matter-can-a-business-method-be-patented/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bilski v kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Ganzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lando & Anastasi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Office Practice Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patentability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Lando]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens Water Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=6369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What constitutes subject matter that can be patented? It’s been studied by the courts for more than 100 years. On this edition of IP Counsel, we delve into the issue and take a close look at the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the recent Bilski v. Kappos decision involving the patentability of business methods. IP [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ip-counsel/2010/09/what-is-patentable-subject-matter-can-a-business-method-be-patented/' addthis:title='What is patentable subject matter? Can a business method be patented? ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What constitutes subject matter that can be patented? It’s been studied by the courts for more than 100 years. On this edition of <em><strong>IP Counsel, </strong></em>we delve into the issue and take a close look at the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the recent <em><strong>Bilski v. Kappos</strong></em> decision involving the patentability of business methods. <em><strong>IP Counsel</strong></em> host, <a title="Attorney Peter Lando" href="http://www.lalaw.com/people/people.cfm?customel_datapageid_1631=1799" target="_blank"><strong>Attorney Peter Lando</strong></a>, partner at the firm of <a title="Lando &amp; Anastasi, LLP" href="http://www.lalaw.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Lando &amp; Anastasi , LLP</strong></a> calls on special guest, <a title="Gary Ganzi" href="http://thomsonreuters.com/content/corporate/case_studies/584764" target="_blank"><strong>Gary Ganzi</strong></a>, VP Intellectual Property for <a title="Siemens Water Technologies Corp" href="http://www.water.siemens.com/en/Pages/default.aspx" target="_blank"><strong>Siemens Water Technologies Corp.</strong></a> (a subsidiary of Siemens, AG), an inventor and holder of more 25 patents and co-chair of the Patent Office Practice Committee of the <a title="Intellectual Property Owners Association" href="http://www.ipo.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home" target="_blank"><strong>Intellectual Property Owners Association</strong></a>, to weigh in on this topic. Join us and find out what is and isn’t patent eligible and where this issue goes from here.</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ip-counsel/2010/09/what-is-patentable-subject-matter-can-a-business-method-be-patented/' addthis:title='What is patentable subject matter? Can a business method be patented? ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&amp;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">|</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ip-counsel/2010/09/what-is-patentable-subject-matter-can-a-business-method-be-patented/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://legaltalkmedia.com/LTN/IPC/IPC_081810_Patentability.mp3" length="18713538" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP Paralegals</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/paralegal-voice/2010/08/ip-paralegals/</link>
		<comments>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/paralegal-voice/2010/08/ip-paralegals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EDC2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Paralegal Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COlleen Sarenpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gray Plant Moory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gwen Spurrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polaroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=6171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the fastest growing areas of law is intellectual property and so the demand for paralegals with that expertise is great. On this edition of The Paralegal Voice, co-hosts Lynne DeVenny and Vicki Voisin welcome Colleen Sarenpa, Director of Trademarks for Polaroid Corporation at PLR Brand Services, LLC and Gwen Spurrier, a paralegal at [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/paralegal-voice/2010/08/ip-paralegals/' addthis:title='IP Paralegals ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the fastest growing areas of law is intellectual property and so the demand for paralegals with that expertise is great. On this edition of <em><strong>The Paralegal Voice</strong></em>, co-hosts <a title="Lynne DeVenny" href="http://www.practicalparalegalism.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Lynne DeVenny</strong></a> and <a title="Vicki Voison" href="http://www.paralegalmentor.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Vicki Voisin</strong></a> welcome <a title="Colleen Sarenpa" href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/colleen-sarenpa/6/597/680" target="_blank"><strong>Colleen Sarenpa</strong></a>, Director of Trademarks for <a title="Polaroid Corporation" href="http://www.polaroid.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Polaroid Corporation</strong></a> at PLR Brand Services, LLC and <a title="Gwen Spurrier" href="http://www.gpmlaw.com/professionals/bio.aspx?id=852&amp;LangType=1033&amp;terms=Gwen+Spurrier" target="_blank"><strong>Gwen Spurrier</strong></a>, a paralegal at the Minneapolis law firm of <a title="Gray Plant Mooty" href="http://www.gpmlaw.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Gray Plant Mooty</strong></a> to discuss IP at a law firm and a major corporation.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsors,   <a title="Westlaw Deposition Services" href="http://www.westlawdepositions.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Westlaw   Deposition Services</strong></a>, and the <a title="Nationa Association of Legal Assistants" href="http://www.nala.org/" target="_blank"><strong>National Association   of Legal Assistants (NALA)</strong></a>.</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/paralegal-voice/2010/08/ip-paralegals/' addthis:title='IP Paralegals ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&amp;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">|</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/paralegal-voice/2010/08/ip-paralegals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://legaltalkmedia.com/LTN/PLV/PLV_081810_IntellectualProperty.mp3" length="22017086" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The U.S. Supreme Court Review July 2010</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/the-u-s-supreme-court-review-july-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/the-u-s-supreme-court-review-july-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyer 2 Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Winkler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amy howe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bilsky v Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens united]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mcdonald v Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mcdonald v City of Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotusblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ucla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=5727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the end of the U.S. Supreme Court term came some stand-out rulings including handgun case, McDonald v. City of Chicago and patent law case, Bilski v. Kappos. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Adam Winkler, a constitutional law specialist from UCLA School of Law and Attorney Amy Howe, the editor [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/the-u-s-supreme-court-review-july-2010/' addthis:title='The U.S. Supreme Court Review July 2010 ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the end of the U.S. Supreme Court term came some stand-out rulings including handgun case, <em><a title="McDonald v. City of Chicago" href="http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago" target="_blank"><strong>McDonald v. City of Chicago</strong></a></em> and patent law case, <a title="Bilski v. Kappos" href="http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=Bilski_v._Kappos" target="_blank"><em><strong>Bilski v. Kappos</strong></em></a>. Attorneys and co-hosts, <a title="J. Craig Williams" href="http://www.sdma.com/j-craig-williams/" target="_blank"><strong>J. Craig Williams</strong></a> and <a title="Bob Ambrogi" href="http://www.legaline.com/lawsites.html" target="_blank"><strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong></a> welcome <a title="Professor Adam Winkler" href="http://www.law.ucla.edu/home/index.asp?page=757" target="_blank"><strong>Adam Winkler</strong></a>, a constitutional law specialist from <a title="UCLA School of Law" href="http://www.law.ucla.edu/home/Default.aspx" target="_blank"><strong>UCLA School of Law</strong></a> and <a title="Attorney Amy Howe" href="http://www.howerussell.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Attorney Amy Howe</strong></a>, the editor of <a title="SCOTUSblog" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/" target="_blank"><strong>SCOTUSblog</strong></a>, to discuss the Supreme Court round-up. In addition, they discuss recent rulings, a liberal vs. conservative Supreme Court, the Elena Kagan confirmation hearings and take a look back at some landmark decisions.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <a title="Clio" href="http://goclio.com/" target="_blank"><strong> </strong></a><a title="SunTrust" href="https://www.suntrust.com/Microsites/wealth/scripts/html/legal_practice.html" target="_blank"><strong>SunTrust</strong></a>, and <a title="Clio" href="http://goclio.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Clio</strong></a></p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/the-u-s-supreme-court-review-july-2010/' addthis:title='The U.S. Supreme Court Review July 2010 ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&amp;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">|</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/the-u-s-supreme-court-review-july-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://legaltalkmedia.com/LTN/C2C/C2C_070610_SupremeCourtReview.mp3" length="28175265" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Quality and Non-Obviousness</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2010/05/patent-quality-and-non-obviousness/</link>
		<comments>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2010/05/patent-quality-and-non-obviousness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 14:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Suffolk Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Ganzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=5352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gary C. Ganzi, JD &#8217;08, discusses ways in which to improve patent quality as well as viewing patent quality from a public policy perspective. Click to learn more about Suffolk Law&#8217;s IP Concentration.<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2010/05/patent-quality-and-non-obviousness/' addthis:title='Patent Quality and Non-Obviousness ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gary C. Ganzi, JD</strong> &#8217;08, discusses ways in which to improve patent quality as well as viewing patent quality from a public policy perspective. Click to learn more about <strong>Suffolk Law&#8217;s <a title="http://law.suffolk.edu/academic/ip/" href="http://law.suffolk.edu/academic/ip/" target="_blank">IP Concentration</a></strong>.</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2010/05/patent-quality-and-non-obviousness/' addthis:title='Patent Quality and Non-Obviousness ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&amp;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">|</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2010/05/patent-quality-and-non-obviousness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://legaltalkmedia.com/LTN/SUL/SUL_051810_PatentQuality.mp3" length="13398015" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Failure</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/boston-university-school-of-law/2010/03/patent-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/boston-university-school-of-law/2010/03/patent-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boston University School of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Meurer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michaels Faculty Research Scholar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=4453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this edition of the Boston University School of Law podcast, host and media veteran, Dan Rea of WBZ-Radio 1030 welcomes Professor Michael Meurer, the Michaels Faculty Research Scholar of Law at BU School of Law, to discuss his new book, Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk. Dan and Professor [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/boston-university-school-of-law/2010/03/patent-failure/' addthis:title='Patent Failure ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this edition of the <a title="Boston University School of Law" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/" target="_blank"><strong>Boston University School of Law</strong></a> podcast, host and media veteran, <a title="Dan Rea of WBZ-Radio 1030" href="http://www.wbz.com/pages/697858.php" target="_blank"><strong>Dan Rea of WBZ-Radio 1030</strong></a> welcomes <strong><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/bios/full-time/meurer_m.html" target="_blank">Professor Michael Meurer</a></strong>, the Michaels Faculty Research Scholar of Law at <strong>BU School of Law</strong>, to discuss his new book, <em><a title="Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk" href="http://www.researchoninnovation.org/dopatentswork/" target="_blank"><strong>Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk</strong></a></em>. Dan and Professor Meurer take a hard look at the American patent system and why many innovators consider this system and the institutions created to protect patents complete failures.</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/boston-university-school-of-law/2010/03/patent-failure/' addthis:title='Patent Failure ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&amp;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">|</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/boston-university-school-of-law/2010/03/patent-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://legaltalkmedia.com/LTN/BUSL/BUSL_022610_PatentFailure.mp3" length="19251414" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Things Patent Practitioners are Talking About</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2009/10/top-10-things-patent-practitioners-are-talking-about/</link>
		<comments>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2009/10/top-10-things-patent-practitioners-are-talking-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Suffolk Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bilski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk Testa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KSR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=3430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Faculty Voices  -  Top 10 Things Patent Practitioners are Talking About with Respect to KSR and Bilski &#8211; Suffolk University Law School offers five academic concentrations. Within our Intellectual Property concentration, we offer a specialization in Patent Law. In this podcast, Kirk Teska, a member of our adjunct faculty, discusses KSR and Bilski.<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2009/10/top-10-things-patent-practitioners-are-talking-about/' addthis:title='Top 10 Things Patent Practitioners are Talking About ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faculty Voices  -  Top 10 Things Patent Practitioners are Talking About with Respect to KSR and Bilski &#8211; Suffolk University Law School offers five academic concentrations. Within our Intellectual Property concentration, we offer a specialization in Patent Law. In this podcast, Kirk Teska, a member of our adjunct faculty, discusses KSR and Bilski.</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2009/10/top-10-things-patent-practitioners-are-talking-about/' addthis:title='Top 10 Things Patent Practitioners are Talking About ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&amp;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">|</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2009/10/top-10-things-patent-practitioners-are-talking-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://legaltalkmedia.com/LTN/SUL/SUL_101609_PatentPractitioners.mp3" length="4702332" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Inside Look at the Peer-to-Patent System</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/08/an-inside-look-at-the-peer-to-patent-system/</link>
		<comments>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/08/an-inside-look-at-the-peer-to-patent-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyer 2 Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanify & King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Webbink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer-to-Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephanie Scruggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West LegalEdcenter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=2883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It can be said that patents are the key to sustaining innovative products and patent law is certainly an active area of legal practice in the U.S. But the U.S. Patent and Trademark office has been overwhelmed and undermanned. Could the Peer-to-Patent system be the answer? Co-Host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Professor Mark Webbink, Executive Director [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/08/an-inside-look-at-the-peer-to-patent-system/' addthis:title='An Inside Look at the Peer-to-Patent System ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can be said that patents are the key to sustaining innovative products and patent law is certainly an active area of legal practice in the U.S. But the U.S. Patent and Trademark office has been overwhelmed and undermanned. Could the <a title="Peer-to-Patent" href="http://www.peertopatent.org/" target="_blank"><strong>Peer-to-Patent system</strong></a> be the answer? Co-Host <a title="Bob Ambrogi" href="http://www.legaline.com/lawsites.html" target="_blank"><strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong></a> welcomes <a title="Professor Mark Webbink" href="http://www.nyls.edu/faculty/faculty_profiles/mark_webbink/" target="_blank"><strong>Professor Mark Webbink</strong></a>, Executive Director of the Center for Patent Innovations, a research and development arm of <a title="New York Law School's Institute for Information Law &amp; Property" href="http://www.nyls.edu/centers/harlan_scholar_centers/institute_for_information_law_and_policy/patent_law_program" target="_blank"><strong>New York Law School&#8217;s Institute for Information Law &amp; Property</strong></a> and <a title="Attorney Stephanie Scruggs" href="http://www.hanify.com/index.cfm/page/biography/lawyer/64" target="_blank"><strong>Attorney Stephanie Scruggs</strong></a> , an expert in patent litigation from the firm of <a title="Hanify &amp; King" href="http://www.hanify.com/index.cfm" target="_blank"><strong>Hanify &amp; King</strong></a>, to take an in-depth look at the innovative Peer-to-Patent system, that employs a crowdsourcing and open source model using experts in the patent process.</p>
<p><a href="http://westlegaledcenter.com/program_guide/search_results.jsf?provider=26200277&amp;requirecoursenumber=false&amp;format=On%20Demand.Live.Live%20Conference.Podcast&amp;sc_cid=ws_Legaltalknet_0310" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4497" title="WLEbadge" src="http://legaltalknetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/WLEbadge.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="35" /></a></p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/08/an-inside-look-at-the-peer-to-patent-system/' addthis:title='An Inside Look at the Peer-to-Patent System ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&amp;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">|</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/08/an-inside-look-at-the-peer-to-patent-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://legaltalkmedia.com/LTN/C2C/C2C_081209_Peer-to-Patent.mp3" length="26621726" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unmasking the Patent Troll Tracker Blogger</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/03/unmasking-the-patent-troll-tracker-blogger/</link>
		<comments>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/03/unmasking-the-patent-troll-tracker-blogger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyer 2 Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dennis couch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patently-o]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raymond niro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troll tracker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the implications of a blogger writing about someone anonymously? Last month, the burning question on everyone’s mind in the patent world was finally answered when the identity of the author of the anonymous, Patent Troll Tracker Blog, was revealed as Rick Frenkel, an IP Director and in-house patent attorney at Cisco Systems. Law.com [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/03/unmasking-the-patent-troll-tracker-blogger/' addthis:title='Unmasking the Patent Troll Tracker Blogger ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the implications of a blogger writing about someone anonymously? Last month, the burning question on everyone’s mind in the patent world was finally answered when the identity of the author of the anonymous, <strong>Patent Troll Tracker Blog,</strong> was revealed as <strong>Rick Frenkel</strong>, an IP Director and in-house patent attorney at Cisco Systems. Law.com blogger and co-host, <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong>, gets two different perspectives from the experts. In the first segment, Craig welcomes <a href="http://www.niroscavone.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Attorney Raymond Niro Sr.</strong></a>, the attorney who was once a target of Frenkel’s blog. In our second segment, Craig speaks with the popular patent blogger, <a href="http://law.missouri.edu/faculty/crouchd.html" target="_blank"><strong>Dennis Crouch</strong></a> from <a href="http://patentlaw.typepad.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Patently-O</strong></a>, to get his perspective on the Troll Tracker and the dangers of blogging anonymously.</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/03/unmasking-the-patent-troll-tracker-blogger/' addthis:title='Unmasking the Patent Troll Tracker Blogger ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&amp;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">|</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/03/unmasking-the-patent-troll-tracker-blogger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://legaltalkmedia.com/LTN/C2C/C2C_032608_PatentTroll.mp3" length="22820571" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

