<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fourth Amendment and Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-fourth-amendment-and-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-fourth-amendment-and-email/</link>
	<description>The Premiere Online Legal Media Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:35:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gingko</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-fourth-amendment-and-email/comment-page-1/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>gingko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=3517#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>Ok, I get the basics here, our email is now protected communication once again. Please explain about the implications of this ruling well. Such as, why should e-mail be treated any different than from regular snail mail? What business does bureaucrat has to do with my electronic communication? Thanks in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I get the basics here, our email is now protected communication once again. Please explain about the implications of this ruling well. Such as, why should e-mail be treated any different than from regular snail mail? What business does bureaucrat has to do with my electronic communication? Thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alin Wagner-Lahmy's Blog</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-fourth-amendment-and-email/comment-page-1/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>Alin Wagner-Lahmy's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=3517#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Podcast: E-mail and the 4th Amendment...&lt;/strong&gt;

Does the Fourth Amendment&#039;s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extend to e-mail...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Podcast: E-mail and the 4th Amendment&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Does the Fourth Amendment&#39;s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extend to e-mail&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-fourth-amendment-and-email/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=3517#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>First off, what about the fact that gmail, hotmail, yahoomail, etc, are essentially free services, while there are other e-mail clients that are paid for.  Would that make a difference?  Second, you reference the fact that the outside of an envelope is private while the inside is not.  Well, metadata of electronic communications (that is, data about data) tells far far more about the package than does the outside of an envelope Finally, about the requirement that the government &quot;give notice&quot;; they have the e-mail address by default. How hard is it to send off an e-mail to the person whose e-mails are being copied?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, what about the fact that gmail, hotmail, yahoomail, etc, are essentially free services, while there are other e-mail clients that are paid for.  Would that make a difference?  Second, you reference the fact that the outside of an envelope is private while the inside is not.  Well, metadata of electronic communications (that is, data about data) tells far far more about the package than does the outside of an envelope Finally, about the requirement that the government &#8220;give notice&#8221;; they have the e-mail address by default. How hard is it to send off an e-mail to the person whose e-mails are being copied?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew D. LeMar's Blog</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-fourth-amendment-and-email/comment-page-1/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew D. LeMar's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=3517#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lawyer2Lawyer: E-mail and the 4th Amendment...&lt;/strong&gt;

Does the Fourth Amendment&#039;s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extend to e-mail...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lawyer2Lawyer: E-mail and the 4th Amendment&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Does the Fourth Amendment&#39;s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extend to e-mail&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alin Wagner-Lahmy's Blog</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-fourth-amendment-and-email/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>Alin Wagner-Lahmy's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=3517#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lawyer2Lawyer: E-mail and the 4th Amendment...&lt;/strong&gt;

Does the Fourth Amendment&#039;s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extend to e-mail...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lawyer2Lawyer: E-mail and the 4th Amendment&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Does the Fourth Amendment&#39;s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extend to e-mail&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Ambrogi's LawSites</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-fourth-amendment-and-email/comment-page-1/#comment-1148</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Ambrogi's LawSites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=3517#comment-1148</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lawyer2Lawyer: E-mail and the 4th Amendment...&lt;/strong&gt;

Does the Fourth Amendment&#039;s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extend to e-mail...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lawyer2Lawyer: E-mail and the 4th Amendment&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Does the Fourth Amendment&#39;s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extend to e-mail&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Volokh Conspiracy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Podcast on the Fourth Amendment and E-mail</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-fourth-amendment-and-email/comment-page-1/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>The Volokh Conspiracy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Podcast on the Fourth Amendment and E-mail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=3517#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>[...] I participated for the first time in the Legal Talk Network’s Lawyer 2 Lawyer podcast. The topic: The Fourth Amendment and E-mail. It’s about 30 minutes long, and it covers some of the recent developments in the law of e-mail [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I participated for the first time in the Legal Talk Network’s Lawyer 2 Lawyer podcast. The topic: The Fourth Amendment and E-mail. It’s about 30 minutes long, and it covers some of the recent developments in the law of e-mail [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Ambrogi's LawSites</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-fourth-amendment-and-email/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Ambrogi's LawSites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=3517#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Podcast: E-mail and the 4th Amendment...&lt;/strong&gt;

Does the Fourth Amendment&#039;s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extend to e-mail...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Podcast: E-mail and the 4th Amendment&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Does the Fourth Amendment&#39;s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extend to e-mail&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Fourth Amendment and Email &#124; Legal Talk Network -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-fourth-amendment-and-email/comment-page-1/#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Fourth Amendment and Email &#124; Legal Talk Network -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=3517#comment-1137</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rex7, Legal Talk Network. Legal Talk Network said: RT @legaltalk The Fourth Amendment and Email http://bit.ly/44ZxMs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rex7, Legal Talk Network. Legal Talk Network said: RT @legaltalk The Fourth Amendment and Email <a href="http://bit.ly/44ZxMs" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/44ZxMs</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
