<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Craigslist Legal Scrutiny</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/05/craigslist-legal-scrutiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/05/craigslist-legal-scrutiny/</link>
	<description>The Premiere Online Legal Media Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:46:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Palfrey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Online Intermediaries</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/05/craigslist-legal-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>John Palfrey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Online Intermediaries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 15:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=1946#comment-266</guid>
		<description>[...] this scene, a Berkman fellow, and director of our Citizens Media Law Project &#8212; comments on a podcast at Legal Talk Network. The themes are similar to those that Adam Thierer and I took up in a debate at ArsTechnica [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this scene, a Berkman fellow, and director of our Citizens Media Law Project &#8212; comments on a podcast at Legal Talk Network. The themes are similar to those that Adam Thierer and I took up in a debate at ArsTechnica [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Muser</title>
		<link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/05/craigslist-legal-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan Muser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltalknetwork.com/?p=1946#comment-205</guid>
		<description>In Texas the cemetery lobby is attempting to pass legislation regulating online brokers of cemetery property. (My business does not buy/sell online, but a great many like Gravesolutions etc and Craigslist do list cemetery property) Anyone who assists a lot owner to sell his cemetery property is included in the definition of &quot;Cemetery Broker&quot; in a proposed bill (HB2369) that would require Regisration as a Broker with the State of Texas. This Bill is purportedly aimed at ONLINE BROKERS OF CEMETERY PROPERTY. All of them are National. 

Is this even constitutional? What laws are currently in place re this sort of thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Texas the cemetery lobby is attempting to pass legislation regulating online brokers of cemetery property. (My business does not buy/sell online, but a great many like Gravesolutions etc and Craigslist do list cemetery property) Anyone who assists a lot owner to sell his cemetery property is included in the definition of &#8220;Cemetery Broker&#8221; in a proposed bill (HB2369) that would require Regisration as a Broker with the State of Texas. This Bill is purportedly aimed at ONLINE BROKERS OF CEMETERY PROPERTY. All of them are National. </p>
<p>Is this even constitutional? What laws are currently in place re this sort of thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

